Labeling

Browse Labeling Content

These comments aim to address dietary supplement rules, regulations, guidance, or other federal policies that are inconsistent with statutory text or the Constitution, where costs exceed benefits, where regulations are outdated or unnecessary, or where regulations impose unforeseen burdens on American businesses.

May 12, 2025

CHPA monitors legislation in all 50 states and Washington, D.C., and takes positions per the direction of the State & Local Government Affairs Committee. As the role of OTC Devices in self-care continues to grow, so too will our engagement on issues at all levels of American government.

Nov 20, 2024

In 1986, California voters overwhelmingly approved the State Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, commonly known as Proposition (Prop) 65. Prop 65 was designed to safeguard the state’s drinking water against chemicals known to the state to harm humans by requiring industry to inform Californians about exposures to such chemicals within the products or services they provide for sale to the public.

Nov 19, 2024

CHPA supports FDA’s continued efforts to support medical device innovation by facilitating to the use of PCCPs for efficient Agency review of medical device modifications. When finalizing the Draft Guidance, CHPA strongly encourages FDA to provide further clarity regarding the content and process for PCCPs on several points.

Nov 19, 2024

CHPA and members of our Dietary Supplements Committee appreciate the opportunity to comment on the recently released Draft Guidance outlining FDA’s approach to food allergen labeling.

Jan 30, 2023

In general, members are very satisfied with the existing regulations for content on the PDP, and recommend that no additional guidance on this topic is needed.

Nov 8, 2022

CHPA appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on NIH ODS strategic plan 2022-2026.

Sep 1, 2022

Filter Results