Proposition 65

Browse Proposition 65 Content

CHPA does not believe that the Beneficial Nutrients Regulatory Concept is necessary or supportive of the intent of the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986.

Apr 30, 2008

Comments on proposed revisions to the Proposition 65 prioritization procedure submitted by the Consumer Healthcare Products Association, Grocery Manufacturers of America, and the National Food Processors Association.

Oct 4, 2004

Imposing Proposition 65 state-level requirements on chemicals actively regulated under federal purview risks duplicative warnings that undermine public trust in national safety determinations. Since the FDA derives allowable limits from the best available science, overriding federal risk-benefit guidelines with California-specific thresholds triggers unnecessary labeling not reflecting real-world exposures from routine product usage shown to be safe.

Filter Results